Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 13:35 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 03:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 08:08 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 01:38 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > Do you know which of those changes fixes the "ls" problem?
> > > 
> > > No, it could be either, both, or neither.  Heck, it _could_ be a
> > > combination of all of the things in my experimental tree for that
> > > matter.  I put this patch out there because I know they're both bugs,
> > > and strongly suspect it'll cure the worst of the interactivity related
> > > delays.
> > > 
> > > I'm hoping you'll test it and confirm that it fixes yours.
> > 
> > Nope, this does not fix it.  "time ls" ping-pongs back and forth between
> > ~0.1s and ~0.9s.  Must have been something else in the first patch.
> 
> Hmm.  Thinking about it some more, it's probably more than this alone,
> but it could well be the boost qualifier I'm using...

OK, with 2.6.16-rc2-mm1, "ls" bounces around between 0.15s and 0.50s.
Better than mainline but the large seemingly random variance is still
perceptible and annoying.  And, "ls | cat" behaves about the same as
"ls", while on mainline it was consistently faster (!).

Do you have an updated patch against -mm that I can test?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux