On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 08:08 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 01:38 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Do you know which of those changes fixes the "ls" problem?
>
> No, it could be either, both, or neither. Heck, it _could_ be a
> combination of all of the things in my experimental tree for that
> matter. I put this patch out there because I know they're both bugs,
> and strongly suspect it'll cure the worst of the interactivity related
> delays.
>
> I'm hoping you'll test it and confirm that it fixes yours.
Nope, this does not fix it. "time ls" ping-pongs back and forth between
~0.1s and ~0.9s. Must have been something else in the first patch.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
