Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces?
chownfn maybe. (fd + name)
I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup.
Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years.
This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one.
FWIW, I think the -at() suffix is just fine, and well established by now
(yes, there is shmat, but the SysV shared memory interfaces are bizarre
to begin with -- hence POSIX shared memory which has real names.)
What I object to is the random, meaningless and misleading application
of the f- suffix.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
