* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We should back out the above commit and add a sysctl variable to control the
> > behavior of load balancing in wake up path, so user can dynamically select
> > a mode that best fit for the workload environment. And kernel can achieve
> > best performance in two extreme ends of incompatible workload environments.
>
> Well I don't see any benchmark numbers in the original patch. Just an
> assertion that it "should" help something.
>
> I'm more inclined to revert it and not add the sysctl (ugh) until we
> have a good reason to do so.
yeah, we should do the revert:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
but i'm quite against a sysctl knob. Especially not for 2.6.16.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
