* Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > hm, we can do this - although the open-coded loop looks ugly. In any
> > case, this is an optimization, and not necessary for v2.6.16. It is
> > certainly ok for -mm.
>
> I could also call this perfomance regressions to 2.6.15, unless there
> is a good reason not to include them, I'd prefer to see it in 2.6.16.
can you measure it? This is tricky code, we definitely dont want to
change it this late in the v2.6.16 cycles, execpt if it's some
measurable performance issue that users will see. (or if it's some
regression, which it isnt.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
