Re: [PATCH 05/13] hrtimer: optimize hrtimer_run_queues

Hi,

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> hm, we can do this - although the open-coded loop looks ugly. In any 
> case, this is an optimization, and not necessary for v2.6.16. It is 
> certainly ok for -mm.

I could also call this perfomance regressions to 2.6.15, unless there is 
a good reason not to include them, I'd prefer to see it in 2.6.16.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 05/13] hrtimer: optimize hrtimer_run_queues
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 05/13] hrtimer: optimize hrtimer_run_queues
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 05/13] hrtimer: optimize hrtimer_run_queues
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
• Next by Date: Re: Filesystem for mobile hard drive
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 05/13] hrtimer: optimize hrtimer_run_queues
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 05/13] hrtimer: optimize hrtimer_run_queues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]