From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:26:34 +0100
> The boot sequence on s390 sometimes takes ages and we spend a very long time
> (up to one or two minutes) in calibrate_migration_costs. The time spent there
> differs from boot to boot. Also the calculated costs differ a lot. I've seen
> differences by up to a factor of 15 (yes, factor not percent).
> Also I doubt that making these measurements make much sense on a completely
> virtualized architecture where you cannot tell how much cpu time you will
> get anyway.
> Is there any workaround or fix available so we can avoid seeing this?
Things are not as slow, but definitely slow on sparc64 too, and it's
also due to the migration cost calculations.
It's also really bad that it's using vmalloc(), for one thing, because
this thrashes the TLB (some of us have 64-entry software replaced
TLBs) and also because you can make no guarentees about how well the
backing physical pages will distribute into the L2 cache.
As a result, wildly different run-to-run results can be expected
particularly for systems with 1-way or 2-way set assosciative L2
caches, which are common on sparc64. I don't know about s390.
I think the migration cost calculator is way overboard and needs to be
toned down a little bit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
