Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:42:12 -0700 Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > - If you want my cheerfully uninformed opinion, we should toss both of
> >   them out and implement suspend3, which is based on the kexec/kdump
> >   infrastructnure.  There's so much duplication of intent here that it's not
> >   funny.  And having them separate like this weakens both in the area where
> >   the real problems are: drivers.
> 
> Ahh!!! I'm surrounded.
> 
> suspend by kexec
> suspend by migration
> 
> Is there a way out?
> 
> Can I avoid it?
> 
> Do all roads lead to suspend?
> 
> :)

All is not lost.
Recently I've had good results with suspend-to-disk (sort of a who cares).
And suspend-to-RAM seems to work for me.... but no resume. :(

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux