Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?

Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If you want to start the IO *now* without waiting on it, call msync(MS_ASYNC)
>  If you don't want to start the IO now, that's really easy, do nothing.
>  If you want to start the IO now and also wait for it to finish, call msync(MS_SYNC)

I've already explained the problems with the start-io-in-MS_ASYNC approach.

>  Presently, the first option is unavailable.

We need to patch the kernel either way.  There's no point in going back to
either the known-problematic approach or to something half-assed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: EC interrupt mode by default breaks power button and lid button
• Next by Date: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3
• Previous by thread: Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
• Next by thread: Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]