Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:


2.4:

	MS_ASYNC: dirty the pagecache pages, start I/O
	MS_SYNC: dirty the pagecache pages, start I/O, wait on I/O

2.6:

	MS_ASYNC: dirty the pagecache pages
	MS_SYNC: dirty the pagecache pages, start I/O, wait on I/O.

So you're saying that doing the I/O in that 25-100msec window allowed your
app to do more pipelining.

I think for most scenarios, what we have in 2.6 is better: it gives the app
more control over when the I/O should be started.

How so?

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux