On 2/8/06, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> > I just don't want my name tainted with accidents that happen during
> > integration because you don't have a recent Linux installation. The
> > RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was enough of an effort, my first patch would've worked,
> > too, hence the GPL.
>
> Well, mailing patch with notice that it is not okay to modify it is
> strange behaviour, and if I was Joerg, I'd just drop that patch, too.
That would be true except if Joerg hadn't started with the exact same
behavior. It would seem that Joerg would be capable of understanding
the irony there.
But maybe if Joerg would move his pride out of the way for 30 seconds,
have a decent look at the patch, return a technical commentary (or
point to an existing one), we could move on. I am sure that Matthias
would be pretty happy to return a better patch. That would make
everybody happy.
Matthias, can you resend the patch, without your notice? Let's see if
Joerg look at it this time.
> If you really want the patch applied, submit it anonymously or
> something like that.
Anonymous submission is not good for tracability reasons...
Jerome
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
