"Jim Crilly" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/03/06 07:31:58PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Matthias Andree <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > So patches to the rescue -- please review the patch below (for 2.01.01a05).
> > > Note that GPL 2a and 2c apply, so you cannot merge a modified version of
> > > my patch without adding a tag that you goofed my fixes.
> >
> > OK, I did not look at it and I never will!
> >
> > Jörg
>
> This is an excellent example to verify how bad cdrecord developent
> is done.....
Well,
cdrecord is done as good as possible.
Note that if peope send a patch together with personal infringements or
untrue claims, the best I can do is to ignore alltogether.
I did spend a lot of time with a fruitful discussion with Matthias.
Then Matthias started this thread.... It now seems like Matthias
does not like to be serious anymore.
I am of course interested to make cdrecord better, but for the price
of spending an ridiculously amount of time ob LKML.
Jörg
--
EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[email protected] (uni)
[email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
