Re: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 02:55:31PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> -#if defined(__alpha_fix__) && defined(__alpha_cix__)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ALPHA_EV67

What in the world is this supposed to fix?  You aren't seriously
suggesting that the compiler has stopped defining these, have you?


r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
    • From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)

• References:
  • [patch 00/44] generic bitops
    • From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
    • From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
    • From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)
  • [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
    • From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
• Next by Date: RE: megaraid bug in kobject_register when no device is present
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]