Re: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 02:55:31PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> -#if defined(__alpha_fix__) && defined(__alpha_cix__)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ALPHA_EV67

What in the world is this supposed to fix?  You aren't seriously
suggesting that the compiler has stopped defining these, have you?


r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
  - From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)

References:
- [patch 00/44] generic bitops
  - From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
  - From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
  - From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)
- [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
  - From: [email protected] (Akinobu Mita)

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
Next by Date: RE: megaraid bug in kobject_register when no device is present
Previous by thread: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] alpha: remove __alpha_cix__ and __alpha_fix__
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]