Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:02, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 
>>+static inline unsigned int hweight32(unsigned int w)
[]
> How large are these functions on x86? Maybe it would be better to not inline them,
> but put it into some C file out of line.

hweight8	47 bytes
hweight16	76 bytes
hweight32	97 bytes
hweight64	56 bytes (NOT inlining hweight32)
hweight64	197 bytes (inlining hweight32)

Those are when compiled as separate non-inlined functions,
with pushl %ebp and ret.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/44] generic bitops
    • From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
  • [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
    • From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 02/44] parisc: add ()-pair in __ffz() macro
• Next by Date: [patch 16/44] generic ext2_{set,clear}_bit_atomic()
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]