Hi Dmitry et al. On Wednesday 08 February 2006 15:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:06, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > This patch is designed to help with diagnosing and fixing the cause of > > problems in suspending/resuming, due to drivers wrongly re-enabling > > interrupts in their .suspend or .resume methods. > > > > I nearly forgot about it in sending patches in suspend2 that might help > > where swsusp fails. > > > > Only sysdevs are guaranteed to be suspebded/resumed with interrupts off, > other devices are suspended with interrupts on (at least on first pass > over device list). Ok. I guess I missed that outcome of that discussion. Sorry for the bogusness :(. Is the sysdev bit useful at all? Regards, Nigel
Attachment:
pgpPdfFjA9qMy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: file system question
- Next by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.15.3] alpha/pci: set cache line size for cards ignored by SRM
- Index(es):