Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Wednesday 08 February 2006 06:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:06, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi all.
> > 
> > This patch is designed to help with diagnosing and fixing the cause of
> > problems in suspending/resuming, due to drivers wrongly re-enabling
> > interrupts in their .suspend or .resume methods. 
> > 
> > I nearly forgot about it in sending patches in suspend2 that might help
> > where swsusp fails.
> > 
> 
> Only sysdevs are guaranteed to be suspebded/resumed with interrupts off,
> other devices are suspended with interrupts on (at least on first pass
> over device list).

Yes, and AFAICT this is how it's supposed to be.  [There was an LKML thread
last year that finished with this conclusion.  I think I can find it for reference,
if necessary.]

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/