Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:23:42AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> If you need this
> functionality, implement it yourself.  setjmp is most likely overkill
> anyway.

OK, I'll roll my own version.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 03/10] s390: earlier initialization of cpu_possible_map
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants
• Next by thread: [PATCH 6/8] UML - Block SIGWINCH in ptrace tester child
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]