On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:37:13AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I assume you have your own setjmp implementation and are not using the
> libc version?
Nope, that would be the next step if this turned out to be untenable,
which I guess it is.
> If you don't then there is a problem. There is a good reason why the
> constants are removed: you couldn't use the values anyway. Your don't
> have the information to "decrypt" them.
You're actually encrypting them somehow? How? And why?
Is there a reason there can't be an API for looking at the contents of
a jmp_buf?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
