Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> writes: > yep, that's what the first network virtualization for > Linux-VServer aimed at, but found too complicated > the second one uses 'pairs' of communicating devices > to send between guests/host Well you need the pairs of course, to communication between the two stack ``instances''. >> With that rule dealing with the network stack is just a matter of >> making some currently global variables/data structures per container. > > yep, like the universal loopback and so ... :) Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: implement swap prefetching
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- Previous by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Next by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Index(es):
 |