Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> writes: > yep, that's what the first network virtualization for > Linux-VServer aimed at, but found too complicated > the second one uses 'pairs' of communicating devices > to send between guests/host Well you need the pairs of course, to communication between the two stack ``instances''. >> With that rule dealing with the network stack is just a matter of >> making some currently global variables/data structures per container. > > yep, like the universal loopback and so ... :) Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
- The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: implement swap prefetching
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- Previous by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Next by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Index(es):
![]() |