On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:50:10PM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
> Vague 'cos I do not know where the problem is. One might say slowdown
> is like a near a 1ms delay per line output, but slowdown does not
> correlate to kernel tick frequency. :(
Two things come to mind: can you try doing a vmstat 1 while running the
test and compare 2.4 vs 2.6? Also, does it make a difference if you switch
from the e100 driver to eepro100?
> I'll take a look at oprofile, report back if I can make sense of it ;)
If the CPU is pegged that will guide fixing things quite nicely, but the
fact that it's 1ms per line sounds like something more sinister.
-ben
--
"Ladies and gentlemen, I'm sorry to interrupt, but the police are here
and they've asked us to stop the party." Don't Email: <[email protected]>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
