Pavel Machek wrote:
On Po 06-02-06 09:49:15, Mark Lord wrote:I'm not sure if we want to save full image of memory. Saving most-used caches only seems to work fairly well.No, it sucks. My machines take forever to become usable on resume with the current method. But dumping full image of memory will need compression to keep that from being sluggish as well.Are you sure? This changed recently, be sure to set /sys/power/image_size.
No such pathname in 2.6.15 (the latest released kernel). Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):
 |