Hi Jim. On Tuesday 07 February 2006 07:07, Jim Crilly wrote: > On 02/06/06 12:56:43AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Oh. What's Pavel's solution? Fail freezing if uninterruptible > > > > > threads don't freeze? > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > AFAICT it's to avoid situations in which we would freeze having a > > > > process in the D state that holds a semaphore or a mutex neded for > > > > suspending or resuming devices (or later on for saving the image > > > > etc.). > > > > > > > > [I didn't answer this question previously, sorry.] > > > > > > S'okay. This thread is an ocotpus :) > > > > > > Are there real life examples of this? I can't think of a single time > > > that I've heard of something like this happening. I do see rare > > > problems with storage drivers not having driver model support right, > > > and thereby causing hangs, but that's brokenness in a completely > > > different way. > > > > > > In short, I'm wondering if (apart from the forking issue), this is a > > > straw man. > > > > It doesn't seem to be very probable to me too, but I take this > > argument as valid. > > > > Greetings, > > Rafael > > CIFS was good for that, if you have a CIFS filesystem mounted and > take the network interface down (which I have my hibernate script do) > before the filesystem is umounted it'll become impossible to umount > the filesystem until the next reboot and I believe the cifsd kernel > thread will be unfreezable. It's been a while since I've done that > so it might be fixed now, but someone should verify it if it still > exists and potentially work with the CIFS people to get it fixed. Thanks for the pointer. I'll take a look at this. Regards, Nigel > Jim. > > _______________________________________________ > Suspend2-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.suspend2.net/mailman/listinfo/suspend2-devel -- See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode
Attachment:
pgpdTIvrQLFSA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: "Jim Crilly" <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: man-pages-2.22 is released
- Next by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Next by thread: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Index(es):