Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation

* Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ingo wrote:
> > Could you perhaps outline two actual use-cases 
> > that would need two cpusets with different policies,
> > on the same box?
> 
> We normally run with different policies, in the same box, on different 
> cpusets at the same time.  But this might be because some cpusets 
> -need- the memory spreading, and the others that don't are left to the 
> default policy.

so in practice, the memory spreading is in fact a global setting, used
by all cpusets that matter? That seems to support Andrew's observation
that our assumptions / defaults are bad, pretty much independently of
the workload.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Virtualization/containers: UTSNAME
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]