Ben Collins wrote on 2006-01-31:
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 21:19 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Jody McIntyre wrote:
Does anyone else feel like killing oui.c?
I have no strong feelings for or against oui.db. It is nice to have the
vendor names decoded in sysfs, although the footprint is considerable:
$ du oui.o ieee1394.ko
252K oui.o
356K ieee1394.ko
OTOH, nobody is forced to compile it in. And except for the Makefile
patch and .gitignore patch which came in this month, oui.db does not
impose a real maintenance burden. The fact that we are too lazy to
update the db saves us work too. :-)
BTW, oui.db has 7048 entries but IEEE lists 8949 today. Either people
vote oui.db off the island now, or I will submit an update.
I vote update it. I really think something like OUI needs to be part of
the kernel lib/ though. Lots of things, like ethernet and bluetooth can
use it. No one really does though.
Yes, drivers/ieee1394/ is the wrong place for oui.db. In case oui.db was
not killed by then, I will submit patches to move oui.db to lib/ later
this month.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- --=- --=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]