ieee1394/oui.db (was Re: [PATCH] ieee1394: allow building with absolute SUBDIRS path)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jody McIntyre wrote:
Does anyone else feel like killing oui.c?

I have no strong feelings for or against oui.db. It is nice to have the vendor names decoded in sysfs, although the footprint is considerable:

$ du oui.o ieee1394.ko
252K    oui.o
356K    ieee1394.ko

OTOH, nobody is forced to compile it in. And except for the Makefile patch and .gitignore patch which came in this month, oui.db does not impose a real maintenance burden. The fact that we are too lazy to update the db saves us work too. :-)

BTW, oui.db has 7048 entries but IEEE lists 8949 today. Either people vote oui.db off the island now, or I will submit an update.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- ---= =====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux