Re: [PATCH] ufs: fill i_size at directory creation

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:18:15AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> How about this as a first small step?
> +	inode->i_size = UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi->s_fsize;

It looks very strange for me.

During "fill super" we set block size of device to fragment size,
so sb->s_blocksize and UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi->s_fsize should be the 
same size on your system: 2048, hence question:
what difference between your and my patch?

-- 
/Evgeniy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Mark CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE as BROKEN
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re [2]: [PATCH] Mark CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE as BROKEN
  - From: Evgeniy Dushistov <[email protected]>
- Re: Re [2]: [PATCH] Mark CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE as BROKEN
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] ufs: fill i_size at directory creation
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] liyitec: Liyitec PS/2 touchscreen driver
Previous by thread: [PATCH] ufs: fill i_size at directory creation
Next by thread: [PATCH] RCU documentation fixes (January 2006 update)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]