On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 13:52 +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > How can you migrate application which consists of two processes doing > IPC via signals? They are not tired inside kernel anyhow and there is > no way to automatically detect that both should be migrated together. > VPSs what provides you such kind of boundaries of what should be > considered as a whole. Could you explain a little bit _how_ VPSs provide this? -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- References:
- RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview
- From: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
- RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
- RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview
- Prev by Date: Re: FYI: RAID5 unusably unstable through 2.6.14
- Next by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- Next by thread: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- Index(es):
![]() |