On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:25:14AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > Arjan had a very good point last time we posted these: we should > consider getting rid of as many places in the kernel where pids are used > to uniquely identify tasks, and just stick with task_struct pointers. That's a very good idea, why didn't you do that? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- References:
- RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview
- From: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
- RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview
- Prev by Date: Re: userspace filesystem Vs kernelspace filesystem
- Next by Date: Add entry.S function name to tag file
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- Next by thread: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
- Index(es):
 |