>So w/ 1GB RAM, no swap, and 1TB disk mmap'd, could this mmap'd space be
added
>to the total memory available to the OS, as is done w/ swap?
Yes.
>And if that's possible, why not replace swap w/ mmap'd disk-space?
Because mmapped disk space has a permanent mapping of address to disk
location. That's how the earliest virtual memory systems worked, but we
moved beyond that to what we have now (what we've been calling swapping),
where the mapping gets established at the last possible moment, which
means we can go a lot faster. E.g. when the OS needs to steal 10 page
frames used for malloc pages which are scattered across the virtual
address space, it could write all those pages out in a single cluster
wherever a disk head happens to be at the moment.
Also, given that we use multiple address spaces (my shell and your shell
both have an Address 0, but they're different pages), there'd be a giant
allocation problem in assigning a contiguous area of disk to each address
space.
--
Bryan Henderson IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose CA Filesystems
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]