On Čt 02-02-06 15:31:55, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:25:27PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Čt 02-02-06 16:43:19, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:28:15PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > Shouldn't the question be "Why are we making this more complicated by moving
> > > > it to userspace?"
> > >
> > > Indeed. It seems that turning the kernel into Hurd is the latest
> > > fad.
> >
> > Heh, try reading suspend2.
>
> Can we leave the playground level insults off of linux-kernel please,
> and keep the discussion at a technical level ?
>
> Such remarks aren't furthering the cause of either implementation.
Well, Olivier said I'm turning kernel into Hurd. So he instead
advocates merging 10 000 lines of code (+7500, contains new
compression algorithm and new plugin architecture). I'd like to add
interface to userland (+300) and remove swap writing (long term,
-1000).
Olivier clearly did not see the patches; is asking him to learn what
he is talking about *that* much to ask?
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
