On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:27:31PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i think this might be a false positive, caused by my (ill-advised) > change below? [i did the change to clean up an unlock ordering > assymetry, but apparently i thus also introduced the xmit_lock -> > queue_lock dependency.] As far as I can see your change can't cause the previous report, unless the validator is treating the trylock in the same way as a normal lock operation. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
- From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
- Prev by Date: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- Next by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Previous by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- Next by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- Index(es):
 |