On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:32:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > update: with all of Herbert's fixes i havent gotten these yet - so maybe > the validator was not producing a false positive, but perhaps the > inet6_destroy_sock()->sk_dst_reset() thing was causing the messages? Maybe. But in that case shouldn't the validator show that code-path? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- References:
- Re: [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] AMD64: fix mce_cpu_quirks typos
- Next by Date: device-mapper log bitset: fix big endian find_next_zero_bit
- Previous by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- Next by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- Index(es):
 |