Hi!
> On St 01-02-06 23:45:15, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > Is that necessary for the mainline, though? We have only one suspend
> > > in the kernel, not "Pavel suspend" and "Nigel suspend", right?
>
> On 2/2/06, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Actually plan is to only have "Rafael suspend" :-). That's basically
> > "Pavel suspend" minus the disk writing parts. That is *long* term.
>
> So what's the plan for short-term? Are userspace suspend and suspend
> modules mutually exclusive or can they co-exist?
They can coexist for as long as neccessary. (At one point, it was even
possible to suspend using userland code, then resume using kernel code
:-).
When I found out noone is really using kernel code any more (2.8.0 or
something), I'd like to get rid of it.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
