Re: [ 02/10] [Suspend2] Module (de)registration.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On St 01-02-06 22:47:41, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 22:37, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2/1/06, Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > +++ b/kernel/power/modules.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > +
> > > +struct list_head suspend_filters, suspend_writers, suspend_modules;
> > > +struct suspend_module_ops *active_writer = NULL;
> > > +static int num_filters = 0, num_ui = 0;
> > > +int num_writers = 0, num_modules = 0;
> >
> > Unneeded assignments, they're already guaranteed to be zeroed.
> 
> Good point. Will fix.
> 
> > > +       list_add_tail(&module->module_list, &suspend_modules);
> > > +       num_modules++;
> >
> > No locking, why?
> 
> Not needed - the callers are _init routines only.

And insmod?
								Pavel



-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux