Re: [ 02/10] [Suspend2] Module (de)registration.

Hi,

On 2/1/06, Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/power/modules.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@

[snip]

> +
> +struct list_head suspend_filters, suspend_writers, suspend_modules;
> +struct suspend_module_ops *active_writer = NULL;
> +static int num_filters = 0, num_ui = 0;
> +int num_writers = 0, num_modules = 0;

Unneeded assignments, they're already guaranteed to be zeroed.

> +       list_add_tail(&module->module_list, &suspend_modules);
> +       num_modules++;

No locking, why?

                                 Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ 02/10] [Suspend2] Module (de)registration.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- [ 02/10] [Suspend2] Module (de)registration.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [Patch:001/004] Unify pxm_to_node id ver.2. (generic code)
Next by Date: [Patch:003/004] Unify pxm_to_node id ver.2. (for x86_64)
Previous by thread: [ 02/10] [Suspend2] Module (de)registration.
Next by thread: Re: [ 02/10] [Suspend2] Module (de)registration.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]