Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency

From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:48:24 +1100

> You might also want to look at multicast but I don't know of any good
> tests for that.

David Stevens at IBM might have some tests.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
  - From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
  - From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: DEVICE POLLING
Next by Date: Re: [x86_64] bttv: linux 2.6.16-rc1 mplayer fails to record ALSA audio and fails tune TV.
Previous by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
Next by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]