Hi. On Wednesday 01 February 2006 22:38, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 2/1/06, Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote: > > The name is currently mostly historical, from the time when these > > components could be built as kernel modules. > > I think suspend_plugin would be a nicer name. Your code is even using > the term 'plugin' and 'filter' instead of module in many places. Hmm. Thought I got rid of all mentions of 'plugin'. I was trying to follow Dave M's advice from LCA :). Filters are slightly different - they're the modules that do the encryption or compression, as opposed to the writers that do the I/O. Regards, Nigel -- See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode
Attachment:
pgp6n0fqKHcYG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: [ 02/10] [Suspend2] Module (de)registration.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kretprobe: kretprobe-booster against 2.6.16-rc1 for i386
- Previous by thread: Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Next by thread: Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Index(es):
 |