Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.

On 2/1/06, Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> The name is currently mostly historical, from the time when these components
> could be built as kernel modules.

I think suspend_plugin would be a nicer name. Your code is even using
the term 'plugin' and 'filter' instead of module in many places.

                            Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [Patch:004/004] Unify pxm_to_node id ver.2. (For i386)
• Next by Date: [PATCH] extract-ikconfig: be sure binoffset exists before extracting
• Previous by thread: [ 09/10] [Suspend2] Append module debug info to a buffer.
• Next by thread: Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]