Re: [Patch] sched: new sched domain for representing multi-core

On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 05:56:47PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Could we all do it with single CONFIG_SCHED_SMT or CONFIG_NUMA or
> something like that? No need for zillion options...

We thought about it too before and felt that CONFIG_SCHED_MC is more appropriate
and cleaner.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Patch] sched: new sched domain for representing multi-core
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] sched: new sched domain for representing multi-core
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch] sched: new sched domain for representing multi-core
• Next by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux try #2 [ was: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) ]
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] sched: new sched domain for representing multi-core
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch] sched: new sched domain for representing multi-core
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]