Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k

 On Mon, Jan 30, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 1/30/06, Olaf Hering <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is there a reason why a 4096 malloc is not recorded?
> > untested patch below.
> >
> > allow SLAB_STORE_USER also with an exact 4k request.
> 
> For architectures that have 4K pages, adding debugging overhead to 4K
> objects is pretty much the worst case. Any particular reason you want
> this?

I'm just curious.

-- 
short story of a lazy sysadmin:
 alias appserv=wotan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
    • From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux try #2 [ was: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) ]
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] exec: Cleanup exec from a non thread group leader.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]