Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k

 On Mon, Jan 30, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 1/30/06, Olaf Hering <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is there a reason why a 4096 malloc is not recorded?
> > untested patch below.
> >
> > allow SLAB_STORE_USER also with an exact 4k request.
> 
> For architectures that have 4K pages, adding debugging overhead to 4K
> objects is pretty much the worst case. Any particular reason you want
> this?

I'm just curious.

-- 
short story of a lazy sysadmin:
 alias appserv=wotan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
  - From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
  - From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
  - From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux try #2 [ was: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) ]
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] exec: Cleanup exec from a non thread group leader.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]