Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k

Hi,

On 1/30/06, Olaf Hering <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there a reason why a 4096 malloc is not recorded?
> untested patch below.
>
> allow SLAB_STORE_USER also with an exact 4k request.

For architectures that have 4K pages, adding debugging overhead to 4K
objects is pretty much the worst case. Any particular reason you want
this?

                              Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
    • From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
    • From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux try #2 [ was: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) ]
• Next by Date: Re: qla2xxx related oops in 2.6.16-rc1
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]