Re: [PATCH] Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt: Clarification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 11:52:05AM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > People complained that we immediatly abandonded the last stable kernel 
> > when a new one came out, so we said we would take patches for a bit on 
> > the last series if people wanted to send them.
> > 
> > That's all, it's not some confusing thing, and we are very much not 
> > going to accept patches for "any" kernel release.
> > 
> > So no, I'm not going to accept this.
> 
> Ok, I gave it a shot. Is it worth pursuing an alternate wording to better 
> document our scope?

Personally, I don't think so, but if you convince enough others...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux