Re: [PATCH] Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt: Clarification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Greg KH wrote:

> People complained that we immediatly abandonded the last stable kernel 
> when a new one came out, so we said we would take patches for a bit on 
> the last series if people wanted to send them.
> 
> That's all, it's not some confusing thing, and we are very much not 
> going to accept patches for "any" kernel release.
> 
> So no, I'm not going to accept this.

Ok, I gave it a shot. Is it worth pursuing an alternate wording to better 
document our scope?

..Chuck..


-- 
http://www.quantumlinux.com
 Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
 ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology

 "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply
  social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux