On Friday 27 January 2006 12:34, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:29:02PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > We planned to push it for 2.6.16 but issues showed up, which Peter has
> > since addressed - but this means the code has not had enough testing to
> > go into 2.6.16 - so it is likely to be in 2.6.17.
>
> Then for 2.6.16, I would like to see smp nice handling patch backed out.
>
> Do you agree?
It's not my decision to keep Peter's patch out of mainline. If you can make a
strong enough case for it then Linus will merge it up even though it's after
rc1. Otherwise I'll let Ingo decide on whether to pull the current
implementation or not - you're saying that with the one thing you described
that misbehaves that it is doing more harm than fixing smp nice handling.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
