Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:29:02PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> We planned to push it for 2.6.16 but issues showed up, which Peter has since 
> addressed - but this means the code has not had enough testing to go into 
> 2.6.16 - so it is likely to be in 2.6.17.

Then for 2.6.16, I would like to see smp nice handling patch backed out.

Do you agree?

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• References:
  • smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
• Next by Date: Re: wrongly marked __init/__initdata for CPU hotplug
• Previous by thread: Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
• Next by thread: Re: smp 'nice' bias support breaks scheduler behavior
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]