On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:16:43PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote: > Just for clarification. What you are saying is that anyone who insists > on contributing to the kernel under GPLv3 - that code would be > prohibited from being included in the kernel? That to contribute to the > kernel you must contribute under the terms presently in place? "terms compatible with those for code already in place". Which is obviously true for any project, since otherwise you end up with result that can not be distributed at all. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux
- From: Patrick McLean <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: pthread_mutex_unlock (was Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow)
- Next by Date: [2.6 patch] net/tipc/: possible cleanups
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Next by thread: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Index(es):
 |