Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paolo Ornati wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:49:33 +1100
Peter Williams <[email protected]> wrote:


However, in spite of the above, the fairness mechanism should have been able to generate enough bonus points to get dd's priority back to less than 34. I'm still investigating why this didn't happen.

Problem solved. It was a scaling issue during the calculation of expected delay. The attached patch should fix both the CPU hog problem and the fairness problem. Could you give it a try?



Mmmm... it doesn't work:

 PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
 5516 paolo     34   0  115m  18m 2432 S 87.5  3.7   0:23.72 transcode
 5530 paolo     34   0 51000 4472 1872 S  8.0  0.9   0:02.29 tcdecode
 5523 paolo     34   0 19840 1088  880 R  2.0  0.2   0:00.21 tcdemux
 5522 paolo     34   0 22156 1204  972 R  0.7  0.2   0:00.02 tccat
 5539 paolo     34   0  4952 1468  372 D  0.7  0.3   0:00.04 dd
 5350 root      28   0  167m  16m 3228 S  0.3  3.4   0:03.64 X

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
 5456 paolo     34   0  115m  18m 2432 D 63.9  3.7   0:48.21 transcode
 5470 paolo     37   0 50996 4472 1872 R  6.2  0.9   0:05.20 tcdecode
 5493 paolo     34   0  4952 1472  372 R  1.5  0.3   0:00.22 dd
 5441 paolo     28   0 86656  21m  15m S  0.2  4.4   0:00.77 konsole
 5468 paolo     34   0 19840 1088  880 S  0.2  0.2   0:00.23 tcdemux


Bummer. At least it didn't classify dd as CPU intensive but the fairness bonus doesn't seem to have kicked in. It's currently awarded as a "one of" bonus each time a delay is too long and I think that it needs to be a bit more persistent over time.

Thanks for testing
Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   [email protected]

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux