Re: Can't mlock hugetlb in 2.6.15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/23/06, Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Don Dupuis wrote:
> > On 1/21/06, Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Don Dupuis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>I have an app that mlocks hugepages. The same app works just fine in 2.6.14.
> > > > That being said, we shouldn't have broken your application.
> > > Don, an strace log of the failing sequence of syscalls could be helpful.
> >
> > sducstart:
> > open("/pivot3/mem/sduc", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666) = 3
> > mmap2(NULL, 1761607680, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_LOCKED,
> > 3, 0) = 0x4e000000
> >
> > This is the strace output of sductest that is a test program to access
> > the shared memory that was setup by sducstart:
> > open("/pivot3/mem/sduc", O_RDWR)        = 3
> > mmap2(NULL, 4194304, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED|MAP_LOCKED, 3,
> > 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory)
>
> Thanks a lot for the strace, that indeed helped to track it down.
>
> This has nothing to do with mlock or MAP_LOCKED - which by the way do
> make more sense in 2.6.15, since they provide a way of prefaulting the
> hugepage area like in earlier releases (now hugepages are being faulted
> in on demand, though never paged out, as Andrew said).
>
> Please try the patch below, and let us know if it works for you - thanks.
> Looks like we'll need this in 2.6.16-rc-git and 2.6.15-stable.
>
>
> 2.6.15's hugepage faulting introduced huge_pages_needed accounting into
> hugetlbfs: to count how many pages are already in cache, for spot check
> on how far a new mapping may be allowed to extend the file.  But it's
> muddled: each hugepage found covers HPAGE_SIZE, not PAGE_SIZE.  Once
> pages were already in cache, it would overshoot, wrap its hugepages
> count backwards, and so fail a harmless repeat mapping with -ENOMEM.
> Fixes the problem found by Don Dupuis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> ---
>
>  fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- 2.6.15/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c 2006-01-03 03:21:10.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c  2006-01-23 18:39:47.000000000 +0000
> @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ huge_pages_needed(struct address_space *
>         unsigned long start = vma->vm_start;
>         unsigned long end = vma->vm_end;
>         unsigned long hugepages = (end - start) >> HPAGE_SHIFT;
> -       pgoff_t next = vma->vm_pgoff;
> -       pgoff_t endpg = next + ((end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +       pgoff_t next = vma->vm_pgoff >> (HPAGE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
> +       pgoff_t endpg = next + hugepages;
>
>         pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
>         while (next < endpg) {
>

This patch fixed my problem.

Thanks very much

Don
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux