On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:25:37 -0500
Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
> This seems right to me, how do you expect X to be treated by the
> scheduler?
Why moving the mouse a little (that causes a microscopic % of CPU
being used) makes X priority jump up to 29 from 6/7 ???
And why this doesn't happen when glxgears (for example) is running?
(under cpu load this is different, with X never getting "good"
priority -- if I remember correctly)
Maybe this is normal and depends on the way X sleeps or something...
I don't know much about schedulers but if I'm able to make the cursor
going in jerks with just a bit of CPU load (linux$ make -j16, for
example) I wonder why X cannot get a better priority...
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.16-rc1-plugsched on x86_64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
