[email protected] (Vincent Hanquez) writes:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:27:50PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So put me in for +1 on the current development model.
>
> I'ld like to also +1 the current development model.
>
> However I think the 2.6.X should become 2.X; the 6 is starting to be
> meaningless, and it's not going to be upgraded ever with the current
> development model.
Why not just drop the "2"? It's not like the "2" is going anywhere
with current or even with the past development models. 2.X.Y has
already been used (for X = 0-6 and modest Y), so 6.16.1 could be used
instead of 2.6.16-rc1.
> this leave 2.X.Y "namespace" to the current stable team (same
> development model as the 2.6.X.Y).
--
Johan KULLSTAM
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
